On Tue, 2025-11-11 at 05:41 -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
From: Simon Glass <simon.glass@canonical.com>
Modern systems mostly use LUKSv2 as it is more secure that v1. This series provides an implementation of this feature, making use of the existing 'luks unlock' command.
Are you sure adding luks to u-boot is a good idea? I'm curious about your use case as seeing the patches brings up bad memories of grub for me :-) I thought the learning from that was to reduce duplicating code in the bootloader and leave fancy stuff like disk encryption and advanced file system features to Linux. IOW load signed but unencrypted kernel and initrd and handle the rest in Linux userspace. cu Ludwig -- (o_ Ludwig Nussel //\ Siemens AG / SI E R&D IOT V_/_ www.siemens.com